MX-1 is the last senior-level compact you can buy under the Pentax brand. However, it may be valuable not only for collectors. Sure its vintage-inspired body would grace any camera shelf, but in the field the MX-1 is still a warrior. This is an advanced compact for advanced amateur photographers, with high-aperture optics, an enlarged sensor and advanced functionality.
Pentax MX-1 compact camera
12 MP 28-112 mm 4x 3″ $440
In terms of features, the camera is quite capable of competing in the big leagues. A 28-112 mm lens with f/1.8 wide angle aperture, 1/1.7 inch sensor with a low resolution of 12 million pixels and therefore higher sensitivity. The three-inch display tilts away from the body, making it easier to shoot from awkward angles. Trendy and useful – a “direct” exposure compensation dial has been added to the interface – every truly professional camera must have one.
Rival Nikon and Canon cameras Pentax MX-1 without viewfinder bypasses them in appearance. But it’s clearly inferior in design to the Fujifilm X20. Its rival has a viewfinder, larger sensor and can record video much better.
Can anyone tell me if the Pentax MX-1 compact camera is worth investing in? I’m in search of a versatile and high-quality camera, and I’ve heard mixed reviews about this particular model. Is the image quality good? How does it perform in low light conditions? Any input would be greatly appreciated!
The Pentax MX-1 compact camera is a solid investment for those seeking versatility and high image quality. It produces excellent image quality with good sharpness and vibrant colors. However, in low-light conditions, the performance may be slightly limited due to the smaller sensor size. Despite this, it still performs reasonably well. Overall, the MX-1 is a reliable and capable camera, but it’s worth considering other options if low-light photography is a priority.