I like the 35mm focal length: wider than 50mm but without the distortion of real “super wide” lenses, just right for leisurely landscape photography. I was cautious about testing it
Canon EF 35/2
for a funny but important reason: I didn’t want to spend a lot of money on a Canon EF 35/1.4L USM, wonder if it was worth paying more than 4 times as much for the Elka?”
| Angle of view diagonal : 63 degrees |
| Optical construction: 7 elements in 5 groups |
| Autofocus actuator: micromotor |
| Aperture range: f/2.0 – f/22 |
| Number of aperture blades: 5 |
| Minimum focus distance: 25 cm |
| Maximum magnification: 0.23x |
| Light filter diameter: 52mm |
| Dimensions: 42*67 mm |
| Weight: 210 grams |
| Hood optional : EW-65II |
Read the full test of the Canon EF 35/2 USM lens at fotosky
What is the overall image quality like on the Canon EF 35mm f/2 lens? Are there any notable distortions or chromatic aberrations?
Can you provide any insights into the quality of the images produced by the Canon EF 35mm f/2 lens? How does it perform in various lighting conditions and with different subjects? I’m particularly interested in understanding its sharpness, color rendition, and overall image quality. Any information or personal experiences you can share would be greatly appreciated!