Compromise in some sense, the update junior model NEX strengthened the integrity and philosophy of the family, and at the same time raised to the current level “budget” line of mirrorless compact systems from Sony. Though NEX-F3 is not that amazing sweetheart like its predecessors, but it is not much inferior to older models in functionality and noticeably outruns many competitors.
16.1MP 18-55mm, F3.5-5.6 3″ $760
The redesigned body has a more expressive handle and is taller. Portability has certainly suffered, but at the same time the F3 is more comfortable, more like the NEX-5N and NEX-7, and the extra bulk in the body is due in part to the built-in flash. Here, the designers probably had to go along with the critics who were dissatisfied with the lack of blitz in the first NEX models.
The second generation of the “basic” in the line of 16-megapixel sensor promises a definite progress in the quality of photos. In particular, the maximum sensitivity threshold of the NEX-F3 has risen to 16,000 ISO. There is a modern video mode with 1080@60i or 24p recording in AVCHD format. We improved camera software, mainly in the area of smart technologies and capture modes. The most noticeable change is the redesigned flip-down display. In addition to the normal raised position that lets you take pictures from the waist, a funny “self-portrait” mode has been added: the screen rises up completely so that it becomes visible from the side of the lens.
New dimensions break the basic principle of creating a “system” replacement for a compact: the camera has not become massive, but former users of miniature devices like “point-and-shoot” will like it less. However, in this class, the NEX-F3, like its predecessors, is the undisputed leader in terms of functionality and quality. And, as before, with an adequate, quite fair price.
How does the image quality of the Sony NEX-F3 compare to other compact cameras in its price range?
Can anyone provide insights on the performance and features of the Sony NEX-F3 compact camera? How does it compare to other models in terms of image quality, ease of use, and versatility? Any recommendations or drawbacks? Thank you in advance for your thoughts!