...

Compact digital camera reviews: compacts or smartphones?

Over the past few months, developers of photographic equipment are trying their best to please experienced amateur photographers. The main trend of the year – instead of individual cool functions to produce a complete harmonious system for users who are at least aware of the exposure and white balance. And perhaps having their own expressed claims and preferences – like a miniature size with a wide angle for genre and street photography or bright optics for portraiture. Instead of a couple of obsolete “bricks”, customers now have a choice of a dozen new products with varied and very interesting features.

Sony RX100 compact camera

Sony was especially notable for their cool RX100 miniature compact with a big one inch sensor and then the totally unexpected RX1 with a fixed lens and full frame sensor.

Panasonic, having kept “compact” sensors, concentrated on optics: LX7 lens has f/1,4 aperture on the short end, and Lumix FZ200 ultrazoom has constant aperture of F2,8 on the whole range of 24x zoom. The stylish Fujifilm XF1 “in leather” with a flip-up mechanical zoom lens looks really appealing. And even Samsung, which is focused more and more on the mass market and not much appreciated by professionals in response , has released a serious “professional” compact.

The reason for such enthusiasm is an open question. Perhaps the manufacturers have realized that the mass user without additional motivation will soon massively move to phones because there is not so much difference between the average “point-and-shoot” and the camera in a modern smartphone. Maybe companies rushed into the niche opened by others, seeing certain prospects in it. After all photography is a very popular hobby and there are a lot of enthusiastic amateur photographers who understand quality and ergonomics and are willing to pay a premium for it, while their aspirations were more or less ignored for a long time.

The advantage of the increased attention to experienced photographers is that ordinary “dummies” can also use the devices designed for them. Novelties are not professional DSLRs which are becoming heavy and senseless hardware in a beginner’s hands: any of listed compacts will work perfectly well in fully automatic mode, giving a noticeably improved picture quality. That is, even if you haven’t yet learned how to control the aperture or don’t want to learn it at all , one of the “professional” compacts will still be a great choice for you. Recommended by!

The disadvantage is that no matter how you think up “professionalism” in the compact segment, this name is purely conventional and is applied only for lack of anything better. Mirror-less “system” cameras are more practical and have a much better photo quality. And recently for a comparable price. It certainly doesn’t mean that compacts are going to die out soon or if you don’t need them now. But if you’re going to spend fifteen thousand on a compact that has special “professionalism” or just cool features, it’s worth carefully considering and weighing all the pros and cons. Perhaps for all the appeal of the fresh, advanced compacts, moving into the “system” class might be the best choice for you.

Rate this article
( No ratings yet )
John Techno

Greetings, everyone! I am John Techno, and my expedition in the realm of household appliances has been a thrilling adventure spanning over 30 years. What began as a curiosity about the mechanics of these everyday marvels transformed into a fulfilling career journey.

Home appliances. Televisions. Computers. Photo equipment. Reviews and tests. How to choose and buy.
Comments: 4
  1. Arden

    Which option is better for someone who wants to take high-quality photos – compact digital cameras or smartphones?

    Reply
  2. Nova Holmes

    Which option, compact digital cameras or smartphones, would you recommend for someone looking to buy a new camera? I’m interested in knowing the advantages and disadvantages of each option, as well as the overall picture quality, ease of use, and versatility. It would be great to hear some personal experiences or expert insights to help make an informed decision. Thank you!

    Reply
    1. Teagan

      It ultimately depends on what you are looking for in a camera. Compact digital cameras tend to offer better picture quality and more advanced features like optical zoom and manual settings. They are also easier to handle and use for beginners. However, they are bulkier and less versatile than smartphones, which can be used for a variety of tasks beyond photography.

      Smartphones are more convenient and compact, allowing you to snap photos on the go easily. The picture quality has improved significantly in recent years, with some flagship models even rivaling compact cameras. However, they lack the advanced features and manual controls of dedicated cameras.

      If you prioritize picture quality and want a camera specifically for photography, a compact digital camera would be the better choice. If you prioritize convenience and versatility, a smartphone would suit you better.

      Personal experiences and expert insights can provide valuable perspectives in making a decision. It may be beneficial to visit a camera store, test out different models, and seek advice from knowledgeable staff. Ultimately, choose the option that best fits your needs and preferences.

      Reply
    2. Everly

      When it comes to choosing between compact digital cameras and smartphones for photography, it ultimately depends on your specific needs and preferences.

      Compact digital cameras generally offer better picture quality, optical zoom capabilities, and manual controls compared to smartphones. They are also dedicated devices designed specifically for photography, resulting in better image quality overall. However, they can be bulkier and less convenient to carry around.

      On the other hand, smartphones offer convenience and versatility. They are compact, lightweight, and always readily available in your pocket. With advances in technology, smartphones now come equipped with high-resolution cameras, various editing apps, and connectivity options for instant sharing. However, the image quality may not be on par with compact digital cameras, especially in low-light conditions.

      In terms of ease of use, smartphones are more user-friendly due to their familiar interface and touch screen controls. Compact digital cameras may have a steeper learning curve for beginners, but they offer more creative control and customization options for advanced users.

      Ultimately, if you prioritize image quality and manual controls, a compact digital camera may be the better choice. However, if convenience and versatility are more important to you, then a smartphone would suffice for everyday photography needs. It’s also worth considering your budget and how you plan to use the camera before making a decision. Personal experiences and expert opinions can provide valuable insights, so consider seeking recommendations from photography enthusiasts or professionals before making your purchase.

      Reply
Add Comments