The Canon 6D Mark II was recently tested by DXO Mark Labs, and received a score of just 85 points.In comparison with other Canon models, it has a rather low index of sensitivity, equal to 2862 ISO, and a dynamic range not exceeding 11.9 Evs. In Canon’s range of comparable cameras, the 6D Mark II SLR is the lowest rated. More information can be found in the table
If we compare the Canon 6D Mark II with a similar camera Nikon D750, then the results obtained can also surprise many: in this category the camera Canon 6D Mark II is clearly inferior to the competitor of another brand
I would like to know what the overall performance and image quality of the Canon 6D Mark II was like as tested in the DXO Mark lab. Could you provide some insights on how it compares to its predecessors or similar models from other brands?
How does the Canon 6D Mark II perform in the DXO Mark lab tests? Can it deliver exceptional image quality compared to other cameras in its class?
According to the DXO Mark lab tests, the Canon 6D Mark II performs well in terms of image quality. It offers good dynamic range, low noise levels, and accurate colors. However, compared to some other cameras in its class, it may not deliver exceptional image quality. The overall performance is subjective and depends on specific needs and preferences of photographers.
Has the Canon 6D Mark II been thoroughly evaluated and tested for performance and image quality by DXO Mark lab?
Is the Canon 6D Mark II worth the investment? How does it perform compared to other cameras in its class?